<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments on my previous post</title>
	<link>http://suggs.net/2007/08/15/comments-on-my-previous-post/</link>
	<description>It slices!  It dices!  It can cut a can as easy as a tomato!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Trimble</title>
		<link>http://suggs.net/2007/08/15/comments-on-my-previous-post/#comment-191</link>
		<author>Scott Trimble</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 01:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://suggs.net/2007/08/15/comments-on-my-previous-post/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Jason,

I can't find your e-mail address anywhere.  Please send me a message.  I'd like to ask you a few questions about Suggs.

Thanks!
Scott Thomas Suggs Trimble
http://www.ststlocations.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find your e-mail address anywhere.  Please send me a message.  I&#8217;d like to ask you a few questions about Suggs.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Scott Thomas Suggs Trimble<br />
<a href="http://www.ststlocations.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ststlocations.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://suggs.net/2007/08/15/comments-on-my-previous-post/#comment-79</link>
		<author>Jason</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 02:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://suggs.net/2007/08/15/comments-on-my-previous-post/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I accept your challenge, good sir.

However, I am a bit confused as to what our first topic of discussion is.  Global warming would be a fine topic to begin with, but I am not exactly sure what you meant by "prioritization" -- specifically, of what?  The discussion?  Global warming?

As for reading Gore's book, I do not think of it as a prerequisite for this dialogue.  Read it if you like, but there are plenty of topics we can discuss outside of its pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I accept your challenge, good sir.</p>
<p>However, I am a bit confused as to what our first topic of discussion is.  Global warming would be a fine topic to begin with, but I am not exactly sure what you meant by &#8220;prioritization&#8221; &#8212; specifically, of what?  The discussion?  Global warming?</p>
<p>As for reading Gore&#8217;s book, I do not think of it as a prerequisite for this dialogue.  Read it if you like, but there are plenty of topics we can discuss outside of its pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://suggs.net/2007/08/15/comments-on-my-previous-post/#comment-78</link>
		<author>Charles</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://suggs.net/2007/08/15/comments-on-my-previous-post/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I choose you (and any other readers who'd like to join us), here, via unadulterated comment spam. :-)

Should global warming be the primary target?  Or one of many factors that assist in prioritization?  I'd suggest the latter, as it allows progress without waiting for everyone involved to be "convinced".  If you agree, then I suppose our main purpose in discussing global warming would be to set up what does seem most likely to prevent/curtail/solve/limit it, and move on to other factors.

Whattaya think?  Also would you prefer I read Gore's book or other material to provide a common vocabulary and starting point for discussion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I choose you (and any other readers who&#8217;d like to join us), here, via unadulterated comment spam. <img src='http://suggs.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Should global warming be the primary target?  Or one of many factors that assist in prioritization?  I&#8217;d suggest the latter, as it allows progress without waiting for everyone involved to be &#8220;convinced&#8221;.  If you agree, then I suppose our main purpose in discussing global warming would be to set up what does seem most likely to prevent/curtail/solve/limit it, and move on to other factors.</p>
<p>Whattaya think?  Also would you prefer I read Gore&#8217;s book or other material to provide a common vocabulary and starting point for discussion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
